Nonne et ethnici hoc faciunt?

Mons. Carlo Maria Viganò

Nonne et ethnici hoc faciunt?

Initial thoughts on “Fratelli tutti”

At a cursory reading of the text of the encyclical Fratelli, tutti would be led to believe that it was written by a Mason, not by the Vicar of Christ. Everything in it is inspired by a vague deism and a philanthropism that has nothing Catholic in it: Nonne et ethnici hoc faciunt? Do not even the pagans do the same? (Mt 5, 47).

Macroscopic and decidedly embarrassing is the historical falsification of St. Francis’ meeting with the Sultan: according to the author of the Encyclical, the Poverello “did not make dialectical warfare by imposing doctrines”; in reality the words of St. Francis that the chroniclers report sound very different: «If you want to promise me, in your name and in the name of your people, that you will pass to the religion of Christ, if I come out unscathed from the fire, I will enter the fire alone. If I am burned, it will be blamed on my sins; if, on the other hand, the divine power will make me go out safe and sound, you will recognize Christ, the power of God and the wisdom of God, as the true God and Lord, Savior of all».

The supernatural dimension is totally absent, just as absent is the reference to the necessity of belonging to the Mystical Body of Christ which is the Holy Church in order to achieve eternal salvation. On the contrary, there is a very serious distortion of the concept of “brotherhood”: for the Catholic it is possible only in Christ if one has God as Father through Baptism (Jn 1:12), while for Bergoglio it would be realized by the mere fact of belonging to the humanity.

The Catholic concept of “reedom of Religion” is replaced by the concept of “religious freedom” theorized by the Second Vatican Council, bartering the divine right of the Church to freedom of worship, preaching and government with the recognition of the right to error to spread not only in general, but even in Christian nations. The rights of truth cannot be bartered by granting rights to error. The Church has the native right to freedom, while false religions do not have it.

The flattening of the Encyclical on the Covid narrative is disconcerting, confirming the enslavement to the single thought and to the globalist élite ; nor is it surprising the obsessive insistence on universal unity and fraternity, together with the condemnation of the legitimate right of the State to protect its own identity not only of culture but also and above all of Faith.

This Encyclical constitutes Bergoglio’s ideological manifesto – his Professio fidei masonicae – and his candidacy for the presidency of the Universal Religion, handmaid of the New World Order. This attestation of subordination to mainstream thought may perhaps be worth the applause of God’s enemies, but it confirms the inexorable abandonment of the Church’s evangelizing mission. On the other hand, we have already heard: “Proselytism is solemn nonsense”.

Bergoglio is a falsifier of reality. It lies with an imprint that knows no equal. On the other hand, the main expert in adulterating the truth is precisely that Chinese dictatorship that has the sinner stoned by Our Lord. (The communist regime has distributed in schools a book with some episodes taken from various religions, including that of the adulteress, who is stoned by Jesus. A complete adulteration of the text.) Evidently the proximity of the communist regime to the Bergoglian church it is not limited to the Agreement but also includes the modus operandi itself.

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop

October 4, 2020

Post a Comment

Archivio