Your Excellency, Caritas magazine is dedicating the dossier of its third issue to the theme of satanism considered in the context of globalization. Do you believe that there is a globalist elite that is satanist or, at the very least, subject to satanic influence?

The presence of evil forces is a reality that humanity has always been confronted with. Satan hates man because he sees in mankind not only the wonderful work of Creation, but the even more wonderful work of Redemption, which the rebel spirits have not merited. Satanism constitutes the perversion and reversal of religion, because while recognizing that God exists, it turns its worship to Lucifer and demons. Whereas revealed Religion has as its goal the salvation and sanctification of souls, satanism by contrast seeks their damnation, in the mad illusion that the victory of Our Lord, the Man-God, can somehow be diminished by snatching as many souls as possible from eternal glory.

The reality of Evil is confirmed by the Holy Scriptures, the Magisterium, and the admissions of the adherents of satanic sects, among which we cannot fail to include Freemasonry. Until recently, because of the social stigma that rightly weighed on satanism because of our Christian culture, those who worship the devil tried to conceal him under the appearance of esotericism; but in recent years, thanks to the supposed secularism of the State and the syncretic ecumenism “à la Pachamama” of the Bergoglian Church, satanism has now claimed the same rights enjoyed by other religions. On the other hand, if the State refuses to recognize and honor the true God and Bergoglio affirms that “all religions are a path that leads to God,” it is not clear what prevents the worshippers of Baal from claiming the freedoms that are granted to the worshippers of Shiva or Mother Earth.

Evil is therefore always organized. This was true in the past, in a hidden and clandestine form; it is also true today, as it keeps one part of its activity secret and another public; and it will be true in the future, when the worship of Satan may well become the only state religion under the reign of the Antichrist. In Christian society prior to the Revolution, nations paid public honor to the true God and recognized that their authority was vicariously derived from the Lordship of Christ. In post-Revolutionary antichristic society, nations pay public honor to irreligion and impiety, shifting the basis of their legitimacy to popular sovereignty. Satan is simia Dei, the ape of God: the entire approach of his evil action against man is the servile inversion of the action of his great enemy, the Catholic Church, and of the societas christiana which is the natural social expression of Catholic doctrine.

You spoke out strongly after the opening and closing ceremonies of the Paris 2024 Olympics. Can you tell our readers which scenes particularly struck you and what was expressly satanic about them?

Some aspects of that infamous performance were intended to arouse outrage and scandal as they were clearly anti-Catholic, such as the blasphemous parody of the Last Supper. But what in my opinion revealed the infernal “trademark” was the effrontery in proposing a show that was not only offensive, but also ugly and repulsive. Truth belongs to God, just as Goodness and Beauty are also Divine attributes. What is True is also Good and Beautiful, because it comes from God. What is false is necessarily bad and ugly, because it comes from the Evil One. This ugliness is the hallmark of satanism: men become ugly and emasculated, women become ugly and aggressive; deformity is celebrated in opposition to the natural harmony of the body, counterfeiting replaces the original, the surrogate cancels out nature.

After the uproar caused by the sacrilegious parody of the Last Supper, which was not only Christ’s final meal but also the institution of Holy Mass by Our Lord, organizers tried to poke fun at the alleged ignorance of Catholics by claiming that they were not inspired by Leonardo da Vinci’s Last Supper, but by a painting by the little-known painter Jan van Bijlert entitled “The Feast of the Gods.” Isn’t this proof that when Catholics express their disagreement with sacrilege, cultural satanism retreats?

What is most disturbing about these increasingly frequent manifestations of impiety is that the propagandists of transgression – which is never an end in itself – try to accustom us to what is horrid and repulsive, what is blasphemous and perverse, in the name of a supposed human fraternity that is supposedly united not in the profession of the One True Faith in the One True God,  but in a shared apostasy and violent and arrogant offense against Jesus Christ.

According to them, we Catholics are imagining sacrilegious attacks at all costs where instead there is only “art” and “freedom of expression.” The reaction of “Catholics” to these episodes is in this sense a clear sign of the present crisis: they protest not the objective fact of the offense against the Majesty of God, but the relative fact of the offense done to those who believe in God. And in so doing, many of them show that they are contaminated by that religious indifferentism which is the first and obvious consequence of the syncretistic ecumenism of Vatican II. “For Catholics, in the Eucharistic Species there is the Body and Blood of Christ,” the modernist bishops tend to say when the Blessed Sacrament is profaned, thereby relativizing the reality that they should instead be firmly proclaiming. But the Most Blessed Sacrament is the Body and Blood of Christ, whether one believes it or not. The Mass is the bloodless sacrifice of Calvary, and Satan knows it very well: this is why he lashes out against it with such vehemence.

Of course, if Catholics were to demand the same respect that the Crescent and the Synagogue enjoy, and above all if they knew how to make themselves respected as the faithful of other religions are respected, the arrogance of satanists and the wicked would still be forced to proceed more slowly. The perspective we must adopt, however, is different: in the eyes of God, and therefore in the eyes of a truly Catholic person, all false religions are indifferently the work of the Evil One – Omnes dii gentium dæmonia (Ps 95:5) – because in all of them there are elements that adulterate what God has taught about Himself and about man’s duty to “know Him, love Him and serve Him in this life, and to enjoy Him in the next life in Heaven.”

During your ministry, you carried out several missions in the field of Vatican diplomacy. Has this international experience allowed you to identify satanic projects on a global scale? Can you give some examples?

The action of the devil is not necessarily made up of black masses and human sacrifices, even if sooner or later those who frequent certain environments are put to the test to demonstrate their loyalty to the sect. The work of the Synagogue of Satan is also made up of great projects that are apparently humanitarian or philanthropic, but which are intended to lead the peoples towards the kingdom of the Antichrist. These subversive plans include the Rockefeller Foundation’s Agenda 2030 adopted by the United Nations and the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset (including the health policies of the WHO), the sustainable goals of the green transition, and immigrationism as a tool of social engineering. LGBTQ+ ideology and gender theory are also clearly satanic projects conducted on a global scale that are intended to kill both man’s body and his soul.

A disconcerting fact, to say the least, will not escape notice, and that is that the “synodal church” supports and promotes all these projects indiscriminately, as if Bergoglio wanted to let his masters know that he has accomplished the tasks given to him. And in fact he seems to have followed all the indications relating to the “springtime of the Church” that John Podesta, on the orders of Hillary Clinton, included in the emails released by Wikileaks. This therefore leads us to consider what is happening in the Church as the fruit of an infernal project inspired and guided by Satan.

Finally, the sordid complicity of Western leaders in the heinous crimes committed against children and adolescents is certainly of Luciferian origin: the pactum sceleris of politicians, rulers, bankers, entrepreneurs, professionals, actors, artists, and sportsmen in the abuse and ritual sacrifices of minors that the System can no longer cover up, shows us a true subversive criminal and satanic organization that bases its success and consolidates its power thanks to the force of blackmail and the bond of secrecy between its adherents. The terror of the  international deep state after the cases of Jeffrey Epstein and Sean Combs is due to the awareness that when the truth comes to light, all the people involved in this huge scandal will no longer be able to be blackmailed and forced to obey the orders of the globalist elite, once the public knows their names and faces. If the weapon of blackmail fails, the infernal machine will jam up and the synarchic project of the Antichrist will slow down just when everything seemed ready to establish the New World Order.

I believe that the secret agreement recently signed and renewed by the Vatican with the communist dictatorship in Beijing is an equally satanic project. International observers denounce a resurgence of civil rights violations by the Chinese government, equal only to that of the 1970s. The persecution of Catholics is ruthless and being conducted on a large scale, with the complicit silence of the government-appointed “bishops” whom Bergoglio rubber stamps without a peep of protest. And the Synod of Bishops was also attended by Chinese “prelates,” always in agreement with the guidelines dictated by the Jesuit. The betrayal by the “synodal church” of Chinese Catholics loyal to the Papacy is consummated by the same usurper of the Papacy itself.

You were the Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the Council of Europe. This institution claims to be the leading human rights organization in Europe. Have you found that the human rights of being respected for one’s political opinions and religious beliefs are satisfactorily guaranteed?

The great contradiction of the post-revolutionary and post-conciliar era consists in leading even traditionalist Catholics to accept the ideological premises of the adversary, trying to turn them to their advantage. The question of human rights – that is, of the principles deriving from the so-called Universal Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of 1789 – leads us to ask for their application also in the defense of our rights, of the rights of Catholics, if only as a matter of uniformity with respect to other believers, who are sometimes privileged ex officio over others. But the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen was written by the Lodges and imposed on revolutionary States by Masonic rulers for the sole purpose of denying the rights of God and of those who believe in Him; even as at the same time they recognize idols, demons and their worshippers as citizens.

We continue to think – influenced by mainstream and politically correct propaganda – that our opponent is loyal and sincere, even if he does not share our ideas; and that there is no reason to doubt what he claims to want to do and how to do it, even if it is obvious every time that he is lying and deceiving us. Those who speak of “human rights” refer, even if only lexically, to a world that is opposed to ours as Catholics, because that concept of “human rights” contains the denial of divine rights. How can we Catholics ask to be – I will not say protected, but at least tolerated – when it is the very fact of our very being Catholic that constitutes a negation of the founding ideas and principles of today’s societies? How could a globalist ruler recognize rights to those who – unlike the followers of the woke religion – will have children whom they will educate in a Christian way, who will grow, work, marry, and multiply, spreading their Faith like a very dangerous virus? We must understand that if we want to get out of this infernal labyrinth we must “think outside the box,” so to speak. We cannot hope to win by following the rules decided on by our opponent, which moreover only apply to us and not to him.

The European Union, closely followed by the Council of Europe, defends the false “rights” imposed by the satanic and globalist elite that governs the West: the “right” of the mother to kill the child she carries in her womb; the “right” of the child (or of the State) to kill the elderly, the sick, and even the poor; the “right” of the pervert to corrupt others and in particular young people by promoting their vices; the “right” of immigrants to commit crimes with total impunity; the “right” of the state to indoctrinate children; the “right” of the individual to change his or her nature through the mutilations of gender transition; the “right” of the individual to contract marriage with persons of the same sex, with other animal species or with objects (I’m not kidding); the “right” of the multinational corporation to use citizens as guinea pigs or slaves.

In 2009 you became Secretary General of the Governorate of the Vatican City State. Under your leadership, an accounting deficit of $10.5 million turned into a surplus of $44 million in just one year. In 2010, you also proposed the Vatican’s exit from the euro, which was rejected. Can you explain to us which dysfunctions were at the root of the deficits? And isn’t transnational banking standardization a way to put pressure on governments, even to implement policies inspired by satanism?

In a context of widespread corruption, it is normal for an action of contrast and control to put an end to the most macroscopic episodes. What is difficult – if there is no precise “political” will – is to eradicate the network of complicity and blackmail that prevents the real work of recovery. So much so that every time I tried to counter this network of corruption by clashing with its leaders, in one way or another I was transferred, and what I had done up to that moment was thwarted. Of course, transnational banking standardization simplifies transactions, and this is an advantage; but at the same time it creates a “dependence” on the undoubted advantages of the financial circuit, and subjects those who adhere to it to the risk of having access suspended for any reason. We must therefore ask ourselves why the Holy See and all its bodies wanted to submit to a control body, the AIF – the Financial Information Agency, initially connected with the Bank of Italy and its Governor Mario Draghi – and to MONIVAL, thus losing its financial sovereignty.

On August 25, 2018, you wrote an open letter denouncing the sex scandal involving Cardinal McCarrick and the complicity he benefited from, and called for the resignation of the Vatican’s top brass, including the Pope. Six months later, in a book entitled “Sodom, investigation into the heart of the Vatican,” the journalist Frédéric Martel denounced the existence, especially at the top of the Catholic hierarchy, of numerous homosexual tendencies, sometimes repressed, but sometimes also seconded. Can we say, as Pope Paul VI did on June 29, 1972, that “the smoke of Satan has entered the temple of God through some cracks,” and that global satanism now acts in the very heart of the Vatican through lust?

Paul VI deplored “the smoke of Satan” even as he opened, or rather threw wide the doors of the Catholic Church in order to better spread the fire that he and his “conciliar church” ardently supported. And it is significant – as I have repeatedly pointed out – that the deviation of the intellect in doctrinal and philosophical questions is almost always accompanied by moral corruption. It is difficult to find chaste heresiarchs, or perverts who are not also heretics.

A good superior, both in the civil and ecclesiastical worlds, chooses honest and upright people as collaborators, so that they are free to act and work without being subject to the blackmail of others and because the superior himself has nothing to fear from their honesty and integrity. Conversely, a superior who is a villain must necessarily surround himself with people who are just as corrupt and even more corrupt than he himself is, so that he can blackmail them and force them to do what he wants, without fear of being blackmailed by them in turn.

Given therefore that there is a global subversive plan that includes nations but also extends to the Catholic Church, and given that in the civil sphere there is a blackmail system based on corruption, through which the elite is obtaining the results it aims for; it is evident that the coup carried out by  the deep state in many countries – including Macron’s France – is also mirrored in the Church of Rome, where the Deep Church has held power for some sixty years. And it is equally evident that even within the Church the plan is being realized precisely because those who have collaborated with it for decades are entangled in vices and crimes that force them, willingly or unwillingly, to obey orders and follow their agenda.

The press reported your statements about Pope Francis, which led the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith to announce your excommunication latæ sententiæ for schism on July 5, 2024. What message would you like to send to the Catholics of Tradition following these events?

To be accused of schism and condemned to excommunication by a sect of schismatics and heretics is paradoxical. But it is also paradoxical to be tried and imprisoned for non-crimes – such as praying silently outside an abortion clinic, refusing inoculation with the gene serum, or opposing the diktats of gender ideology  – by a State governed by the emissaries of Klaus Schwab or McKinsey.

The Vatican, occupied by a usurper and his courtiers, launches excommunications and anathemas only against those who – since they are not blackmailable and thus have nothing to fear – denounce heresies, scandals, and foul complicity. Along with the censorship of “disinformation,” the political use of justice is widespread in Western “democracies” in order to eliminate dissenting voices. It is not surprising that the “synodal church” of the Argentine Jesuit also adopts the same methods.

To traditional Catholics I ask: Would Leo XIII have declared me to be in schism and excommunicated for denouncing the errors of a “council” that he himself would have condemned? And what would have been the position of a canonist in the face of the evidence of the subversive action of the usurper Bergoglio, if not to consider his elevation to the Papacy illegitimate and null and void?

According to some observers, one of the globalist projects is to replace all religions with a single syncretistic religion. This religion is supposed be inspired by an interreligious ecumenical approach also extended to non-Christian religions and even to non-Abrahamic ones. Pope Francis has taken numerous steps in this direction and you have denounced the neo-global religion that is expected to have a temple in Abu Dhabi. What can faithful Catholics do to preserve the true faith?

It is not a question of “a few observers,” but of the architects of this syncrestist project that is rooted in the heretical doctrines of Freemasonry, et pour cause! All false religions are fully entitled to appear in the globalist Pantheon, since they are all – albeit to an apparently different extent – the result of the work of Satan. The only religion to be excluded is obviously the only True Religion, which not surprisingly is also the only one whose supernatural action Satan fears. Bergoglio, as an exponent and emissary of the globalist elite, cannot fail to enthusiastically promote what is ultimately the natural landing place of Vatican II: the reunification of Christian denominations hoped for by the conciliar decrees soon expanded first to Judaism and with Assisi also to monotheistic religions and “religious traditions,” and then was extended by Bergoglio to the indigenous superstitions of the Americas as well. In this it seems to me that we can see the total heterogeneity of the “conciliar and synodal church” with the Catholic Church, and this is what makes it a  schismatic and heretical sect, and therefore it deserves to enter the temple of Abu Dhabi or wherever space is given to false gods and false religions. Nor can we deny that Bergoglio’s dissolving action is perfectly consistent with the premises laid down by the Council and gradually brought to their logical consequences by the conciliar popes.

Thus, just as in the civilized world we cannot effectively fight globalism if we continue to share its Revolutionary ideological foundations, in the religious world we cannot oppose the apostasy of the “synodal church” if we continue to share its Conciliar theological foundations. And since the deep state operating in the civil sphere and the deep church operating in the religious sphere are two sides of the same infernal coin, it is logical to expect that the syncretistic project for a great Masonic and Luciferian Religion of Humanity will find total and unconditional support both among civil rulers as well as among the Bergoglian hierarchy.

Both citizens and the faithful are being defrauded of legitimate authority in the State and the Church, replaced by corrupt traitors totally subservient to the elite. Recognizing the legitimacy of these frauds would essentially mean “forcing” Our Lord – who is King and High Priest and the Only One who holds full title to All Power – to ratify a power that actively rebels against Him and usurps His authority to do Evil and prevent Good. But such recognition is repugnant to reason even before it is repugnant to Faith.